|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 17, 2006 12:33:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FPN on Aug 17, 2006 12:35:52 GMT -5
Sweet...Summerslam wouldnt be the same without him on the card.
|
|
|
Post by FPN on Aug 17, 2006 12:37:45 GMT -5
Edge vs. Cena Booker vs. Batista DX vs. McMahons Hogan vs. Orton Rey vs. Chavo Flair vs. Foley Sabu vs. Show vs. Angle
WOW. Seven matches may seem small for SummerSlam but look at those! All main events. This is going to be an awesome SummerSlam!
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 17, 2006 12:44:22 GMT -5
I still am hopeful RVD will be in that match as well......plus Lashley/Finlay.
|
|
|
Post by FPN on Aug 17, 2006 12:55:14 GMT -5
That would be sweet. I'm definitely ordering this S-Slam though....the current card has me sold.
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 17, 2006 12:58:58 GMT -5
I might go see this at the movie theatres.....then again, I think I'm going out to a bar that night witrh my cousins.....hopefully it'll be on.
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 19, 2006 21:22:05 GMT -5
Source: WrestlingObserver.com at prowrestling.com
|
|
napperx
Registered Member
Posts: 19
|
Post by napperx on Aug 20, 2006 2:27:41 GMT -5
What is odd is that since Mick Foley is rumored to have creative control over his match with Ric Flair, and Foley and Flair both want to lose their own match; Are we looking at a No Contest in the end?
|
|
|
Post by TestSubjekt on Aug 20, 2006 6:17:46 GMT -5
I didn't realize that someone else had creative control in their contract besides Hogan. Well, at least it's Foley and he usually more or less does what's right.
I still question whether Austin does as well.
|
|
|
Post by Hellwig on Aug 20, 2006 8:27:22 GMT -5
I would say no on Austin because of the incident where he was going to lose to the Coach at Taboo Tuesday.
BTW this card is awesome. Last years card only had 8 matches and 1 of them was Benoit winning in less than 30 seconds. So that really can't be counted. As for Eugene vs Angle was not really a classic either.
|
|
|
Post by TestSubjekt on Aug 20, 2006 8:32:41 GMT -5
That's a good point on Austin. But why give the clause to Foley and Hogan, but not Stone Cold? And why wouldn't he insist on the clause? Shall I guess he doesn't need it because his feet aren't broken so he can walk out and his truck is always fueled...?
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 20, 2006 11:57:40 GMT -5
PWI at prowrestling.com
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 20, 2006 18:21:55 GMT -5
prowrestling.com
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 21, 2006 0:11:08 GMT -5
gerweck.net
|
|