|
|
Post by Hellwig on Aug 9, 2006 21:07:23 GMT -5
Just wondering cause I don't want to post the results on this board if this is a spoiler free board. Or didn't Tomb get around to creating one yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 9, 2006 21:15:50 GMT -5
Since we don't have a spoilers board, I'm guessing everything can go here for now.
As you can see towards the bottom of the page, I have the spoilers for this week's Smackdown posted.
Until a spoilers board is made (or if it's NOT made), I think putting a warning in the title would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 10, 2006 0:19:02 GMT -5
Sounds good to me Dye.
|
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 10, 2006 22:31:42 GMT -5
So, yeah...this is what we're going to do since, as of right now, there are no plans of making a Wrestling Spoilers thread.
NO spoilers will be posted in the weekly RAW, Smackdown, ECW, and Impact threads. NO spoilers will be posted in the PPV threads.
If you see a spoiler and want to post it, I suggest making a new thread and giving a warning in the title. For example...let's say that Lex Luger was coming back to the WWE, aight? You'd put "*Spoiler* on Lex Luger" or something to that effect in the title.
As for Smackdown and Impact (or any other show) spoilers, I suggest doing it like I did for Smackdown this week..."*Spoilers* for Smackdown 8/11".
Sound good? Good.
I'm going to keep this stickied for now...
If there are any questions or suggestions...don't hesitate. We're all ears (well...eyes, heh).
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 10, 2006 23:02:40 GMT -5
Can we have maybe one RAW/SD!/ECW/iMPACT! Spoiler thread, and then people can just post spoilers about the results or appearances or angles on a specific show in there?
|
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 10, 2006 23:05:01 GMT -5
Yeah, but wouldn't that go under the (for example) Smackdown results thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 10, 2006 23:08:02 GMT -5
It could, or we could just include those every week within that thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 10, 2006 23:10:41 GMT -5
I guess. I don't really have a problem with that. My only worry is how, after a while, those threads can get pretty long and confusing for some people.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 10, 2006 23:13:56 GMT -5
Yeah, that's true too.......the thing with spoilers is that their title can give away a lot of information without even having to click in them.
|
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 10, 2006 23:18:05 GMT -5
Yeah, which is pretty much why I wanted a spoilers board.
But that's why I suggested putting something like "*Spoilers* on so and so". It's not much, but at least it doesn't say exactly what's happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 10, 2006 23:22:12 GMT -5
Yeah, I guess as long as the title doesn't give things away, we're good.
|
|
|
|
Post by TestSubjekt on Aug 11, 2006 16:40:32 GMT -5
For example...let's say that Lex Luger was coming back to the WWE, aight? You'd put "*Spoiler* on Lex Luger" or something to that effect in the title. I think the title gives it away still like that. Mentioning who doesn't leave you with much to guess...either TNA or WWE, since they're the only ones on tv who have storylines  Don't you think? I'd say if Lex Luger was coming back to WWE and you wanted to post a thread, you might title it "HUGE return *spoilers*"Now let's not use that example anymore. I think WWE programming is bad enough as it is, to even want to think about Luger coming back to WWE. If it was news on a future storyline for a current superstar it would be ok to mention the superstars name like... "Orton's future plans *spoilers*"Or if you read something for RAW that night....Yup. You'd post "RAW spoiler for tonight"Sound good? |
|
|
|
Post by DyEaBoLiKaL on Aug 11, 2006 17:10:21 GMT -5
I'm fine with the second two examples.
I think the first one will get a little repetitive since there's always going to be someone rumored to be returning or switching companies. So, we're just going to have a bunch of threads with pretty much the same title.
We could always have one long thread, but those can get too long and outdated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hellwig on Aug 12, 2006 9:54:20 GMT -5
Yeah I agree about the long threads becoming too long and because some people just don't click on them. Because on the old board not everyone read the news and notes threads and thus something someone put under the news and notes thread a day ago would get its own thread a day later by accident. Because the poster who started the new thread dud not bother to read the news and notes thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by UCan on Aug 12, 2006 10:16:25 GMT -5
Whatever is decided I'm fine with. Just my 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportznutt on Aug 12, 2006 10:33:37 GMT -5
Welcome UCan!
|
|
|
|
Post by UCan on Aug 12, 2006 11:13:42 GMT -5
Thanks dude!
|
|
|
|
Post by Awesomeness Reeker on Aug 12, 2006 15:49:20 GMT -5
wouldn't "SPOILER - ..." be a more efficient protocol?
|
|
|
|
Post by YANKS on Aug 12, 2006 17:36:58 GMT -5
wouldn't "SPOILER - ..." be a more efficient protocol? Aye...it's the best way to do it too IMO. Sort of like the fantasy board right now where putting the "SPORT - " is the easiest... Also using all caps would be best too.. i.e *SPOILER* so it's quite visible that you're reading one |
|
